Decision Details

  • General
  • Reports

This section allows you to view the general details of a Decision

Details

Status:
Implemented
Title:
Iron Lane – Stechford Junction Improvements – Full Business Case
Include item on Forward Plan/ Key Decision
Yes
Reference:
000315/2015
Urgent Decision - Not in Forward Plan
No
Details for Agenda Sheet
Report of Strategic Director of Economy
Implementation Date (not before meeting on)
Tue 16 May 2017
Purpose
To seek approval to the Full Business Case
Key Portfolio
OLD - Development, Transport and the Economy
Decision Maker
Cabinet
Chief Officer Decision Maker
------ N/A ------
Reason For Key Decision
more than £1m Capital and more than 1 Ward
Relevant Documents
Decision Type:
Committee
Decision Maker:
Cabinet
Directorate
Other Information
Private Reason
Decision Outcome
On 16 May 2017, Cabinet:- (i) In its capacity as the Council and as Accountable Body for the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership, approved the Full Business Case for the Iron Lane Junction Improvement Scheme as detailed in Appendix A to the report and the project cost breakdown as detailed in the private report, at a total capital cost of £12.984m including fees; (ii) Authorised the Assistant Director, Transportation and Connectivity to enter into a funding agreement and accept £5m of Local Growth Fund grant funding through the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership; (iii) Approved the making of a Compulsory Purchase Order under sections 239, 240 and 250 of the Highways Act 1980 in respect of the land and rights within the areas shown edged black on drawing CA_02709_S1_001 Rev J (Appendix F to the report); (iv) Authorised the City Solicitor to carry out all preparatory work for the Compulsory Purchase Order (including land referencing), and make and submit the order to the Secretary of State for Transport for confirmation, preparation for Public Inquiry (if required) and to serve all necessary notices to give effect to the Compulsory Purchase Order and its implementation, including High Court Enforcement Officer Notices and (if granted power to do so) to confirm the Compulsory Purchase Order; (v) Authorised the Assistant Director of Property (Interim) to negotiate and complete the acquisition (and disposal if required) of any interest to facilitate the building of the new highway including easements and drainage in the adjoining land connected to the scheme, in advance of and alongside the confirmation of the Compulsory Purchase Order and to agree costs and compensation relating to the Compulsory Purchase Order, and authorise the City Solicitor to complete such acquisitions or disposals or easements and seal any documents in connection therewith; (vi) Authorised the City Solicitor to draft and submit for confirmation an Order in accordance with Section 14 and Section 125 of the Highways Act 1980 (or other such similar Orders as may be required) to support the Compulsory Purchase Order; (vii) Authorised the City Solicitor to advertise of the loss of Public Open Space within the area shown edged black on the plan at Appendix G, in accordance with Section122(2A) of the Local Government Act 1972, and consideration by the Leader of any objections to the appropriation; (viii) Subject to the Leader being satisfied after consideration of any such objections in respect of (vii) above, or if no objections are received, approved the appropriation of the open space land from Place Directorate to Economy Directorate for Transportation use; (ix) Noted the use of £7.038m Bus Lane Enforcement Surplus to fund this project in line with the Updated Transportation and Highways Funding Strategy 2017/18 to 2022/23 Programme Definition Document Report to Cabinet 16th May 2017; (x) Authorised the City Solicitor to negotiate, execute and complete all necessary agreements and documentation to give effect to the above recommendations. THE DEADLINE FOR CALL IN IS 1600 HOURS ON MONDAY 22 MAY 2017.
Is the Decision Maker Aware of the Decision:
No
Is the Head of Services Aware of the Decision:
No
Is Decision County Wide:
No
Would the recommended decision be contrary to the budget and policy framework:
No
Decision Options:

Additional Information

Reg 10
Reg 11

Decision Criteria

This Decision does not contain any decision criteria records.

Wards

(OLD) Hodge Hill; (OLD) Stechford and Yardley North; (OLD) Washwood Heath

Topics

This Decision does not contain any Topic records

Overview and Scrutiny

Economy, Skills and Transport Overview and Scrutiny Committee

This section displays the history of the Decision.

Decision History

Date & Time CreatedUser Full NameStatus DescriptionDetails
 Page 6 of 9, items 51 to 60 of 87.
26/10/2016 11:01:46Janet HinksMeeting Added13/12/2016 10:00AM
17/11/2016 12:16:16Dave ArnoldGeneral Details Edited 
17/11/2016 12:16:36Dave ArnoldMeeting Deleted13/12/2016 10:00AM
17/11/2016 12:24:48Dave ArnoldMeeting Added16/05/2017 10:00AM
02/12/2016 15:19:32Dave ArnoldGeneral Details Edited 
02/12/2016 15:20:16Dave ArnoldMeeting Deleted16/05/2017 10:00AM
02/12/2016 15:20:28Dave ArnoldMeeting Added24/01/2017 10:00AM
07/12/2016 10:57:00Dave ArnoldGeneral Details Edited 
07/12/2016 10:57:09Dave ArnoldMeeting Deleted24/01/2017 10:00AM
07/12/2016 10:57:12Dave ArnoldMeeting Added14/02/2017 10:00AM

Approval/Comments

Workflow ActionUserRequested DateResponse Due DateResponded DateResponseResponse Comment
Approve Janet Hinks Mon 29 Jun 2015 - 03:31 Fri 31 Dec 9999 Mon 29 Jun 2015 - 03:31 Accepted